Links
Archives
- 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
A tribute to Condoleeza Rice and George W. Bush who, despite voluminious evidence to the contrary, said, "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," adding that "even in retrospect" there was "nothing" to suggest that" and "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees," respectively.
Sunday, October 30, 2005
GOP Lying Point Update
David Brooks and William Safire get the memo.
Brooks said this incident with Libby was an isolated matter and did not show a "cancer on the administration." On the contrary, it's more like an unsightly blemish, perhaps a pimple.
Safire had the temerity to laud Judith Miller's work. Of course, he did not mention the spoon-fed Chalabi fabrications Miller used in her "work" on WMD and the run-up to the war.
As mentioned below, the lying points are now in plain view. Brooks, Safire, Cornyn and Graham make the same points, draw the same questionable conclusions and try to diminish the importance of the leak and the inquiry that's followed. Either they are channeling each other, or they're all getting their lying points from the same source.
GO Propaganda
|
Brooks said this incident with Libby was an isolated matter and did not show a "cancer on the administration." On the contrary, it's more like an unsightly blemish, perhaps a pimple.
Safire had the temerity to laud Judith Miller's work. Of course, he did not mention the spoon-fed Chalabi fabrications Miller used in her "work" on WMD and the run-up to the war.
As mentioned below, the lying points are now in plain view. Brooks, Safire, Cornyn and Graham make the same points, draw the same questionable conclusions and try to diminish the importance of the leak and the inquiry that's followed. Either they are channeling each other, or they're all getting their lying points from the same source.
GO Propaganda
