Links
Archives
- 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
A tribute to Condoleeza Rice and George W. Bush who, despite voluminious evidence to the contrary, said, "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," adding that "even in retrospect" there was "nothing" to suggest that" and "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees," respectively.
Monday, June 27, 2005
Supreme Court Will Not Hear Plame Leak Case
Source
First of all, where's the outraged response from Limbaugh, Hannity, Hume, Frist, DeLay and others for the revealing of an undercover CIA operative in an act of political revenge and intimidation by someone within the Bush administration like they feigned about Durbin and his comments regarding Gitmo?
Secondly, there is a valid argument about protecting sources which reveal the criminal acts of others so that they may be brought to justice. But that is not the case here. Here, the revelation was itself a criminal act tantamount to treason which puts us all at greater risk from nuclear proliferation.
Why hasn't Bush used his "impeccable instincts" to figure out who the leaker is? Probably, because he already knows.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
First of all, where's the outraged response from Limbaugh, Hannity, Hume, Frist, DeLay and others for the revealing of an undercover CIA operative in an act of political revenge and intimidation by someone within the Bush administration like they feigned about Durbin and his comments regarding Gitmo?
Secondly, there is a valid argument about protecting sources which reveal the criminal acts of others so that they may be brought to justice. But that is not the case here. Here, the revelation was itself a criminal act tantamount to treason which puts us all at greater risk from nuclear proliferation.
Why hasn't Bush used his "impeccable instincts" to figure out who the leaker is? Probably, because he already knows.
Justice delayed is justice denied.
