Links
Archives
- 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
- 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
A tribute to Condoleeza Rice and George W. Bush who, despite voluminious evidence to the contrary, said, "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon, that they would try to use an airplane as a missile," adding that "even in retrospect" there was "nothing" to suggest that" and "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees," respectively.
Thursday, February 17, 2005
THANKS NIGHTLINE: Gannon-Gate
First of all, I want to thank Nightline in particular and major media in general for refusing to cover this scandal. The reason I want to single out Nightline is because so far we've had reports on traffic jams and Prince Charles' upcoming wedding. First of all, traffic congestion is not news. Secondly, I personally couldn't care much less about the British Royal Family. Why MSM insists on elevating stories about a figurehead monarchy is beyond me. Anyway, ABC in the last few weeks, has taken an obvious pro-Bush tact from their Iraq election coverage to aiding in this coverup.
It's been reported that Jeff Gannon was present at a White House press briefing nearly a month before Talon News' immaculate conception.
So, when did Jim/Jeff first apply for a press pass to the House and the Senate? The answer to this has some significant implications if the first request was after his first appearance at the White House given what has been stated so far as the White House policy for determining admittance.
Seriously, everyone gets signed in and out. Where's the record. Hopefully, it's not on microfiche somewhere in Colorado.
Anyone still think this White House is beyond "setting up" Dan Rather?
|
First of all, I want to thank Nightline in particular and major media in general for refusing to cover this scandal. The reason I want to single out Nightline is because so far we've had reports on traffic jams and Prince Charles' upcoming wedding. First of all, traffic congestion is not news. Secondly, I personally couldn't care much less about the British Royal Family. Why MSM insists on elevating stories about a figurehead monarchy is beyond me. Anyway, ABC in the last few weeks, has taken an obvious pro-Bush tact from their Iraq election coverage to aiding in this coverup.
It's been reported that Jeff Gannon was present at a White House press briefing nearly a month before Talon News' immaculate conception.
So, when did Jim/Jeff first apply for a press pass to the House and the Senate? The answer to this has some significant implications if the first request was after his first appearance at the White House given what has been stated so far as the White House policy for determining admittance.
Seriously, everyone gets signed in and out. Where's the record. Hopefully, it's not on microfiche somewhere in Colorado.
Anyone still think this White House is beyond "setting up" Dan Rather?
